Methodical Implementation of Application Performance Management

The concept of APM will not yield any value as long as the approach toward the process is flawed. Due to its live monitoring and problem alert notification capability of APM tools, organizations tend to rely heavily on it hoping to triage the problem as soon as it happens. In a complex heterogeneous environment it is an advantage for the organization to be notified about the problem on the fly, but a disadvantage to be notified at an increasing rate. The core problem of APM is the absence of methodical implementation and maintenance of instrumented data in pre/post-production environments. Enabling the dashboards, streaming alerts is certainly overwhelming. To reduce the cost of quality organizations need to proactively monitor, analyze and triage issues in pre-production environment. And to achieve this organizations need to tap into the goldmine of instrumented data and ask themselves:

  1. How is the data being instrumented?
  2. What is being instrumented?
  3. How and where is it being retained? How long should it be retained?
  4. What is the quality of the data?
  5. Is the data being tied and referenced across various tiers in the application environment?
  6. Is the raw data being cleansed, characterized and clustered into a readable form for further analysis?
  7. How do we determine the sanity or correctness of the data? Are there any other tools and  methods to cross-reference the same?
  8. What tools do we apply to further analyze and report the data?

5 Replies to “Methodical Implementation of Application Performance Management”

  1. I really like what you post here. Very insightful and intelligent. One problem though. I’m running Opera with Debian and parts of your current layout pieces are a little wonky. I realize it’s not a typical set up. Yet it’s something to keep in mind. I hope that it will help and continue to keep up the top quality writing.

  2. Its wonderful to actually find a person that knows what they are discussing; most often you find individuals that exaggerate excessively. I wish more people would read your well-authored post; I know I will certainly be looking for more of your work.

  3. Just about all of what you say is astonishingly accurate and that makes me ponder why I had not looked at this with this light previously. This particular piece truly did turn the light on for me personally as far as this specific issue goes. But there is one particular issue I am not necessarily too comfy with and whilst I try to reconcile that with the actual main idea of your issue, allow me observe just what all the rest of the readers have to point out.Nicely done.

  4. The heart of your writing while sounding reasonable at first, did not work well with me after some time. Someplace within the paragraphs you actually were able to make me a believer but only for a while. I nevertheless have got a problem with your leaps in logic and one would do well to help fill in all those gaps. When you actually can accomplish that, I could surely end up being impressed.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *